Madrid 1987 Imdb |link| -

I’ll assume you mean the 1987 Spanish film Madrid, listed on IMDb — here’s a vivid, concise write-up.

Why the IMDb Score is What It Is

The 6.7 rating tells a story of sharp division. Users often praise the film’s raw, theatrical intensity—two characters, one room, no escape. José Sacristán’s performance as Miguel, a weathered intellectual who wields words like weapons, is frequently cited as masterful. María Valverde’s Ángela, initially vulnerable but gradually defiant, earns equal respect. Madrid 1987 Imdb

However, negative reviews on IMDb commonly cite two issues: I’ll assume you mean the 1987 Spanish film

  1. The nudity and power dynamic. The film’s prolonged full-frontal nudity (both actors appear naked for roughly two-thirds of the runtime) is described by some as exploitative, others as essential. The generational and age-gap tension—he in his 60s, she in her 20s—makes many viewers uncomfortable by design.
  2. The talkiness. For a film set entirely in a bathroom, dialogue is the only engine. Some users find the philosophical sparring brilliant; others call it pretentious or repetitive.

Memorable Scenes (imagined highlights)

  • Dawn on Gran Vía: a long tracking shot following the young worker as the city wakes — storefronts opening, buses rumbling, the city’s noise becoming a character.
  • Late-night rooftop conversation: two characters trade confidences under a helium sky, Madrid’s lights shimmering below as they confront regret and desire.
  • A tense market chase: narrow alleys and staircases become a claustrophobic maze, punctuated by sudden bursts of motion and breathless close-ups.
  • Quiet hospital corridor: the nurse pauses, listening to distant TV chatter and the hum of fluorescent lights — a small gesture revealing deep compassion.

7. Critical Consensus vs. Audience Score

| Source | Rating / Sentiment | |--------|--------------------| | IMDb Users | 6.3 — Polarizing | | Rotten Tomatoes (Tomatometer) | 80% Fresh (based on 10 reviews) | | Rotten Tomatoes (Audience) | 55% — Divisive | | Metacritic | 65/100 — Generally favorable | The nudity and power dynamic

Critics praised its audacity; general audiences often found it pretentious or uncomfortable.